The architecture studio sits quiet and dark, save for a few desks where the glow of monitors illuminates tired faces. It’s 9 p.m., and while most professionals have long since headed home, these architects are still hunched over their keyboards, putting the finishing touches on tomorrow’s client presentation. They’re not being paid for these extra hours – it’s just “part of the culture.”
This scene plays out in architecture firms across the country every night. It’s a tradition as old as the profession itself: the expectation that architects, especially those early in their careers, should be willing to work beyond their paid hours for the sake of the craft, the client, or the firm.
But this culture of free labor – from unpaid internships to uncompensated overtime – isn’t just tradition. It’s a systemic issue that affects everything from the quality of our work to the diversity of our profession to the very sustainability of our business model. And it’s time we had an honest conversation about it.
The Intern’s Dilemma
Let’s start at the beginning: the internship. For decades, unpaid internships were seen as a rite of passage in architecture. The reasoning went something like this: “We all did it, it’s how you learn, and it’s your entrance ticket to the profession.”
I remember my own early days, watching talented classmates juggle unpaid internships with part-time jobs just to make ends meet. Some of the brightest minds I knew couldn’t afford to take these “opportunities,” effectively locking them out of valuable experience and networking. The message was clear: if you couldn’t afford to work for free, maybe architecture wasn’t for you.
This system has perpetuated a troubling cycle. Those who can afford to work for free gain experience, connections, and eventually, paid positions. Those who can’t are left behind, regardless of their talent or potential. It’s a dynamic that has contributed to architecture’s ongoing struggles with diversity and inclusion.
The Overtime Epidemic
But the culture of free labor doesn’t end with internships. In fact, that’s just where it begins. The expectation of unpaid overtime has become so normalized in architecture that many firms build their business models around it.
I’ve seen it countless times: projects are budgeted assuming staff will put in extra hours without compensation. Deadlines are set with the unstated understanding that people will work nights and weekends to meet them. It’s considered “professional dedication” rather than what it actually is: uncompensated labor.
The impact of this culture is far-reaching:
- Physical and mental health issues from overwork
- Reduced work quality due to fatigue
- Higher turnover rates as burned-out staff seek other opportunities
- Difficulty retaining talent, particularly those with family responsibilities
- Devaluation of our professional services
Perhaps most troublingly, this culture sends a message that architectural work isn’t valuable enough to be properly compensated. When we don’t value our own time, how can we expect clients to do so?
The Legal and Ethical Framework
Here’s where things get interesting – and potentially concerning for many firms. The legal landscape around unpaid labor has shifted significantly in recent years. The U.S. Department of Labor has specific criteria for unpaid internships, and many common practices in architecture firms don’t meet these standards.
As for overtime, while salaried professionals are often exempt from overtime requirements, this exemption isn’t as broad as many firms assume. There are specific salary thresholds and job duty requirements that must be met for the exemption to apply.
But beyond the legal considerations, there are ethical ones. As a profession that prides itself on improving the built environment and serving society, shouldn’t we be equally concerned with the well-being of our own workforce?
The Business Case for Change
Here’s the thing: the culture of free labor isn’t just harmful to workers – it’s bad business. When we rely on unpaid work, we:
- Undervalue our services
- Create unsustainable business models
- Drive talented people from the profession
- Reduce the quality of our work
- Increase liability through fatigue-related errors
- Perpetuate inequitable practices that limit diversity
I’ve seen firms that operated this way for years suddenly face a crisis when key staff burn out or leave, taking their institutional knowledge with them. The cost of high turnover far exceeds what it would have cost to properly compensate people in the first place.
Creating a More Equitable Future
So what’s the solution? How do we break free from this deeply entrenched culture? Here are some strategies I’ve seen work:
1. Proper Project Budgeting
Start by budgeting projects based on realistic work hours and appropriate staffing levels. This might mean higher fees, but it’s essential for sustainability. Remember: if your business model only works with free labor, it doesn’t actually work.
2. Fair Compensation for Interns
Paid internships aren’t just ethical – they’re an investment in the future of your firm and the profession. They allow you to attract diverse talent and build loyalty early in people’s careers.
3. Clear Overtime Policies
Establish clear policies about overtime, including when it’s necessary and how it will be compensated. This might mean additional pay, comp time, or other benefits – but it should never be expected for free.
4. Efficient Resource Management
Look for ways to improve efficiency and reduce the need for overtime. This might include:
- Better project management tools
- Strategic use of technology
- Outsourcing or offshoring routine tasks
- Improved workflows and processes
5. Cultural Shift
Perhaps most importantly, we need a cultural shift. This means:
- Valuing work-life balance
- Measuring productivity by results, not hours
- Encouraging efficient work rather than martyrdom
- Leading by example at the management level
The Path Forward
Breaking free from the culture of free labor won’t be easy. It requires us to challenge deeply held assumptions about our profession and how it should operate. But the benefits – both human and financial – make it worth the effort.
I’ve seen firms that have made this transition. They typically find that when they properly value and compensate their people’s time:
- Quality of work improves
- Staff retention increases
- Diversity naturally grows
- Client relationships become more sustainable
- Profitability actually increases
The future of architecture depends on our ability to create sustainable, equitable business models that value all contributors fairly. It’s time to leave behind the culture of free labor and build something better – not just for ourselves, but for the next generation of architects.
Because ultimately, a profession that can design sustainable buildings should be able to create sustainable careers. We just need to be willing to put in the work to make it happen.
Learn how WeCollabify helps architecture firms create sustainable growth while fostering work-life balance – reach out to explore how we can support your practice’s evolution.
Jeremy Zick is the founder and CEO of WeCollabify, a pioneering offshoring firm dedicated to transforming architectural and engineering practices. With over a decade of experience managing international teams and integrating global talent, Jeremy has become a leading voice in the industry.
Jeremy’s passion for innovation and efficiency led him to establish WeCollabify, with the mission to empower firms to leverage global resources for enhanced project execution and competitive edge. When he’s not driving industry change, Jeremy enjoys exploring new cultures and finding creative solutions to complex business challenges.